Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 14:34

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
Who was the actor least deserving of an Academy Award?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Italy citizenship referendum polarises country - BBC
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Cannabis can pack an unexpected punch for older users, experts warn - OregonLive.com
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Walmart Nintendo Switch 2: it was in stock and will be back next week - The Shortcut | Matt Swider
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
"How does Claude AI ensure data privacy and security?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What are some common examples of human hypocrisy?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.